Codeforces Round #251 (Div. 2), problem: (B) Devu, the Dumb Guy editorial: http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/12545
Codeforces Round #251 (Div. 2), problem: (B) Devu, the Dumb Guy solution: http://ideone.com/41CElp
#include <iostream> #include <cstdio> #include <algorithm> using namespace std; int c[100005]; int main() { long long int n, x, s=0; scanf("%I64d%I64d", &n, &x); for(int i=0; i<n; i++) scanf("%d", &c[i]); sort(c, c+n); for(int i=0; i<n; i++) { s+=c[i]*x; if(x>1) x--; } printf("%I64d", s); return 0; }
note: i got AC with code shown above but i got WA with code shown below:
#include <iostream> #include <cstdio> #include <algorithm> using namespace std; int c[100005]; int main() { int n, x; long long int s=0; scanf("%d%d", &n, &x); for(int i=0; i<n; i++) scanf("%d", &c[i]); sort(c, c+n); for(int i=0; i<n; i++) { s+=c[i]*x; if(x>1) x--; } printf("%I64d", s); return 0; }
and the reason of that i think is - well, lets open wider topic for that:
C / C++ number conversion and Casting:
i did arithmetic operations on int and assigned it to long long int, but it did not gave the expected result, so lets glance some C / C++ number type conversions and Casting:
Conditions Met
|
Conversion
|
---|---|
Either operand is of type long double.
|
Other operand is converted to type long double.
|
Preceding condition not met and either operand is of typedouble.
|
Other operand is converted to type double.
|
Preceding conditions not met and either operand is of typefloat.
|
Other operand is converted to type float.
|
Preceding conditions not met (none of the operands are of floating types).
|
Integral promotions are performed on the operands as follows:
|
n C++ operators (for POD types) always act on objects of the same type.
Thus if they are not the same one will be promoted to match the other.
The type of the result of the operation is the same as operands (after conversion).
Thus if they are not the same one will be promoted to match the other.
The type of the result of the operation is the same as operands (after conversion).
If either is long double the other is promoted to long double
If either is double the other is promoted to double
If either is float the other is promoted to float
If either is long long unsigned int the other is promoted to long long unsigned int
If either is long long int the other is promoted to long long int
If either is long unsigned int the other is promoted to long unsigned int
If either is long int the other is promoted to long int
if either is unsigned int the other is promoted to unsigned int
If either is int the other is promoted to int
Both operators are promoted to int
Conversions can occur explicitly as the result of a cast or implicitly as required by an operation. Although conversions are generally required for the correct execution of a program, they can also lead to lost or misinterpreted data. Conversion of an operand value to a compatible type causes no change to the value or the representation.
The C integer conversion rules define how C compilers handle conversions. These rules include integer promotions, integer conversion rank, and the usual arithmetic conversions. The intent of the rules is to ensure that the conversions result in the same numerical values and that these values minimize surprises in the rest of the computation. Prestandard C usually preferred to preserve signedness of the type.
Integer Promotions
Integer types smaller than
int
are promoted when an operation is performed on them. If all values of the original type can be represented as an int
, the value of the smaller type is converted to anint
; otherwise, it is converted to an unsigned int
. Integer promotions are applied as part of the usual arithmetic conversions to certain argument expressions; operands of the unary +
, -
, and ~
operators; and operands of the shift operators. The following code fragment shows the application of integer promotions:
Integer promotions require the promotion of each variable (
c1
and c2
) to int
size. The two int
values are added, and the sum is truncated to fit into the char
type. Integer promotions are performed to avoid arithmetic errors resulting from the overflow of intermediate values:
In this example, the value of
c1
is multiplied by c2
. The product of these values is then divided by the value of c3
(according to operator precedence rules). Assuming that signed char
is represented as an 8-bit value, the product of c1
and c2
(300) cannot be represented. Because of integer promotions, however, c1
, c2
, and c3
are each converted to int
, and the overall expression is successfully evaluated. The resulting value is truncated and stored in cresult
. Because the final result (75) is in the range of the signed char
type, the conversion from int
back to signed char
does not result in lost data.Integer Conversion Rank
Every integer type has an integer conversion rank that determines how conversions are performed. The ranking is based on the concept that each integer type contains at least as many bits as the types ranked below it. The following rules for determining integer conversion rank are defined in the C Standard, subclause 6.3.1.1 [ISO/IEC 9899:2011]:
- No two signed integer types shall have the same rank, even if they have the same representation.
- The rank of a signed integer type shall be greater than the rank of any signed integer type with less precision.
- The rank of
long long int
shall be greater than the rank oflong int
, which shall be greater than the rank ofint
, which shall be greater than the rank ofshort int
, which shall be greater than the rank ofsigned char
. - The rank of any unsigned integer type shall equal the rank of the corresponding signed integer type, if any.
- The rank of any standard integer type shall be greater than the rank of any extended integer type with the same width.
- The rank of
char
shall equal the rank ofsigned char
andunsigned char
. - The rank of
_Bool
shall be less than the rank of all other standard integer types. - The rank of any enumerated type shall equal the rank of the compatible integer type.
- The rank of any extended signed integer type relative to another extended signed integer type with the same precision is implementation-defined but still subject to the other rules for determining the integer conversion rank.
- For all integer types
T1
,T2
, andT3
, ifT1
has greater rank thanT2
andT2
has greater rank thanT3
, thenT1
has greater rank thanT3
.
The integer conversion rank is used in the usual arithmetic conversions to determine what conversions need to take place to support an operation on mixed integer types.
Usual Arithmetic Conversions
The usual arithmetic conversions are rules that provide a mechanism to yield a common type when both operands of a binary operator are balanced to a common type or the second and third operands of the conditional operator (
? :
) are balanced to a common type. Conversions involve two operands of different types, and one or both operands may be converted. Many operators that accept arithmetic operands perform conversions using the usual arithmetic conversions. After integer promotions are performed on both operands, the following rules are applied to the promoted operands:- If both operands have the same type, no further conversion is needed.
- If both operands are of the same integer type (signed or unsigned), the operand with the type of lesser integer conversion rank is converted to the type of the operand with greater rank.
- If the operand that has unsigned integer type has rank greater than or equal to the rank of the type of the other operand, the operand with signed integer type is converted to the type of the operand with unsigned integer type.
- If the type of the operand with signed integer type can represent all of the values of the type of the operand with unsigned integer type, the operand with unsigned integer type is converted to the type of the operand with signed integer type.
- Otherwise, both operands are converted to the unsigned integer type corresponding to the type of the operand with signed integer type. Specific operations can add to or modify the semantics of the usual arithmetic operations.
No comments:
Post a Comment