Wednesday, March 3, 2021

2015 e-commerce report of Turkey

I prepared this e-commerce report in September 2015 for a very stupid company in Europe. They were working for Google adwords and they tried to enter Turkish e-ads market in 2015. They asked me to prepare it and duly I did it spending 2-3 sleepless nights on it. I emailed them, but stupid, foolish company ignored all my work. So, now I am publishing it for public.

Turkey Ecommerce Report

 

19  Sep 2015,  Ankara

T*** B***

 

Turkey Internet Penetration Numbers 2015[1]

36mln internet users, Global rank = 17

Penetration percentage 46 %, Global rank = 97

Advantage: Turkey’s penetration percentage will rise till it saturates, and reaches to roughly 85%. It’s user growth is currently between 3% and 6%.

 

Turkey broadband Internet subscription Numbers[2]

The country ranks 15th with 8.4 mln fixed wired Internet subscribers, and ranks 80th with 10.5 %.

It ranks 20th with 13 mln mobile cellular subscriptions, and ranks 79th with 16.3%

As you can see, it’s percentage will rise till it saturates. The Internet subscription will rise to 33%, and mobile cellular to 61%. It’s a huge advantage.

 

Turkey smartphone penetration[3]

It’s smartphone penetration 29.6%, ranking 40th. I think it will rise to top-20 with more than 50% penetration. The market is unsaturated.

 

Approximately 12 000 e-commerce websites operate in Turkey.[4]

 

Turkish consumers spent 5.4 bln euros on products and services online in 2012. Four in ten Turkish internet users frequently uses a smartphone to access the internet. Based on the results of a survey conducted by the Turkish Statistical Institute, 24.8% of all internet users aged 16-74 in Turkey bought goods and services online. [5]

 

 

 

The chart below shows leading e-retailers and their sales in million euros. [6]

 

 

The chart below shows daily time spent with select media in Turkey from 2011 to 2013 (in hours).[7]

 

The statistic shows the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Turkey from 2010 to 2013, with projections up until 2020. [8]

 

 

The statistic shows the gross domestic product (GDP) in Turkey from 2010 to 2014, with projections up until 2020. [9]

 

 

Some conclusions from report [10] of The Turkish Industry and Business Association in 2014:

·        In terms of e-commerce, Turkey can currently be viewed in a stage where e-commerce mostly involves the online sale of products whose specifications, content and qualities are easier to determine with certainty - such as the online sale of books and media products - and where the sale of products whose content and quality need to be observed physically - such as fashion items - is not a common occurence.

·        The Turkish e-commerce sector had a volume of 15,3 TRY in 2012.

·        Additionally, the report points out the presence of an important B2B e-commerce market with a volume of 5.5 billion USD in 2012.

 

Furthermore, the website Webrazzi also has published another report [11] in March 2014 - where the following e-commerce statistics for Turkey take place:

·        E-commerce constitutes 0.8% of retail sales in Turkey, as opposed to 9.6% in the UK, 6.5% in the US, 3.2% in Brazil, and 2.1% in Russia.

·        The number of vertical online stores has grown by 35% in the textiles industry, by 39% in the Automotive industry, by 32% in the hardware store sector, by 27% in the cosmetics sector, and by 16% in the electronics industry in 2012. In the same year, the growth rate of e-commerce in these sectors ranged from 32% (automotive) to 53% (hardware stores).

·        91% of people already buying online view e-commerce as safe, while 84% of those not buying online see e-commerce as risky.

·        In 2013, while 68% of customers in Turkey purchasing items online have preferred using credit cards, 15% have used payments through bank transfer, 12% paid at the door, 3% used mobile payments and 2% paid through mail orders.

·        In 2013, 20% of online credit card payments were made for services, 17% for airlines, 17% electronics, 14% travel, 13% for telecommunications, 3% supermarket and market purchases, 2% for clothes.

·        The sectors with the highest revenue generated from online sales were Services (6,8 billion TRY), electronics (5,9 bn TRY), Airlines (5,7 bn TRY), Travel (5,6 bn TRY), and Telecoms (4,4 bn TRY).

·        Around 78% of online customers using credit card payments preferred single installment payments as opposed to multiple installments.

·        In the first 10 months of 2013, 47% of male internet users and 36% of female users had purchased items online. These figures were 31% of males and 23% of females for individuals aged between 18-24, 54% of males and 40% of females for ages 25-34, 54% of males and 43% of females for ages 35-44, 46% of males and 50% of females for ages 45-54, 38% of males and 21% of females for ages above 55.

 

Below is infographics [12] and report about Ecommerce by Association of e-commerce retailers, ETID[13]:

·        Online retail in Turkey is expected to see an annual growth of 15.8 per cent in constant value terms by 2017, 107 per cent in total, reaching a market value of $6.6 billion, according to global market research company Euromonitor International. On-going technological development, Turkey’s growing population and a sustainable rise in online shopping is expected to continue to support the rapid expansion of Turkey’s e-commerce sector.

·        The research company estimates Internet usage to rise 27.5 per cent between 2012 and 2017, driving e-commerce. The market penetration of smartphones is expected to increase by 124.4 per cent between 2012 and 2017.

·        There are currently around 40 million Internet users in Turkey (53% of the population), which in the European ranking of countries with the highest number of internet users puts Turkey in 5th place, just after Germany, Russia, the UK and France. Half of the population is under 30 years old and actively use social networks (Turkey has close to 33 million Facebook users, ranking six in the world). That, along with an enthusiastic fervour for business enterprise, makes Turkey the ideal country to promote e-commerce. In 2012 total B2C e-sales has reached €5.4 billion, over 50 per cent up against 2011

·        The Turkish youth population is increasingly technologically literate and urbanised, having grown in the Internet age and in cities, unlike their fathers. This trend is exacerbated by Turkey’s growing wealth, allowing more people to by luxury goods, such as smart phones and PCs. With the expansion of Turkey’s GDP per capita by over ten per cent in real terms between 2007 and 2012, the future looks bright for Turkish e-commerce.

 

 

 

Below is the infographics about Market attractiveness of Turkey, considering eCommerce. Some sources[14] used to gather data are Euromonitor, Internation Telecommunication Union, Planet Retail, World Bank, A. T. Kearney analysis and Kleiner Perkins trends:

Below is the table based on A. T. Kearney’s 2013 Global Retail Ecommerce Index Ranking by Online market attractiveness score[15]. Turkey drops from 9th (see above infographics, which is 2012 data) place to 22nd in one year. However, Turkey is just 2 pts lesser than 15th ranked Italy.

Below are the charts [16] about credit, debit cards, POS terminals and ATM numbers and Turkey’s regional ranking:

Below is the infographics[17] about how mobile and banks effect consumer behavior:

The table[18] below shows social penetration based on active users of the largest active social network in each country:

Below is the table that depicts social penetration by country based on a global web index survey of each country’s internet users[19]:

This statistic[20] presents the social network penetration in Turkey as of fourth quarter 2014. The most popular social network was Facebook with a 26 percent penetration rate. Overall, 52 percent of the population were active social media users:

In infographics[21] below, Turkey’s ecommerce users and their spending is depicted:

 

 

The Chart below shows of online & total retail volume by Country in bln TRY[22]:

The Chart below shows of the share of online to total retail by Country[23]:

Below is Top 10 Related Searches in All Categories in Turkey for past 12 months.[24] As you see, sahibinden.com ranks 4th, which good indicator of online transactions. Sahibinden.com is an online C2C classifieds and shopping platform[25]:

Chart below shows Top 10 searches in Advertising & Marketing category in Turkey for past 12 months[26]. The words in brackets are translations of the related words. Fun fact: Turkish people are crazy when it comes to buying mobile phone. To prevent huge import of mobile phones, government introduced high taxes on import ones and supported local companies to produce its local mobile phones.[27]

Graph below indicates Web search Interest over time in Advertising & Marketing category in Turkey for past 12 months.[28]

The chart below displays Rising searches in Advertising & Marketing category in Turkey for past 12 months.[29] Words in brackets are translations or explanations of the queries.

Chart below shows Top 10 related searches in Retail Trade category in Turkey for past 12 months.[30] (fyi[31]: translation)

Graph below is Search Interest over time in Retail Trade category in Turkey for past 12 months.[32]

Table below is Rising search queries in Retail Trade category in Turkey for past 12 months.[33] (fyi: translation)

Below is Top 10 related searches in Shopping category in Turkey for past 12 months.[34] (fyi: translation)

Graph below depicts Search Interest in Shopping category in Turkey for past 12 months.[35]

Table below is Rising searches in Shopping category in Turkey for past 12 months.[36] (fyi: interpretation)

List shows Top 25 websites in Turkey.[37] There are 3 ecommerce platforms among them.

1

Google.com.tr

 

2

Facebook.com

 

3

Google.com

 

4

Youtube.com

 

5

Twitter.com

 

6

Sahibinden.com

Online classifieds & ecommerce platform

7

Milliyet.com.tr

News

8

Eksisozluk.com

Mix of urbandictionary and facebook

9

Onedio.com

Content provider

10

Hurriyet.com.tr

News

11

Haber7.com

News

12

Live.com

 

13

Yandex.com.tr

 

14

Mynet.com

 

15

R10.net

Webmaster forum

16

Ensonhaber.com

News

17

Instagram.com

 

18

Haberturk.com

News

19

Wikipedia.org

 

20

T.co

 

21

Gittigidiyor.com

Ecommerce

22

Blogspot.com.tr

 

23

Sozcu.com.tr

News

24

Yenisafak.com

News

25

N11.com

Ecommerce

Some stats[38] indicate Turkey is strong player in shopping business:

·        Sales in 2013 were around 40% higher than the previous year, with growth rates close to this number expected for the next three years.

·        M-Commerce has a high growth potential in Turkey, with smartphone penetration of almost one-third on the total population in 2013 and increasing every year. In the 18-24 year-old group, the smartphone penetration rate is over 50%. Around a quarter of online shoppers use mobile devices to make purchases over the Internet.

·        Consumer Electronics and Appliances was the largest B2C e-commerce physical product category in Turkey in terms of sales, while apparel has the highest reach of online shoppers, especially female.

·        The largest player on the Turkish B2C e-commerce market was online mass merchant Hepsiburada.com with a high one-digit market share. In 2013, its sales were growing by +50% compared to 2012. Other players, such as store-based and online retailer of electronics, Teknosa, and private shopping club, Markafoni.com, also saw their sales increase significantly, while local online food delivery company, Yemeksepeti, expanded to the Middle East under the Foodonclick brand.

·        The two most visited e-commerce websites were automobile classifieds, the online marketplace, Sahibinden.com, and B2C/C2C auction and marketplace, Gittigidiyor.com. Private shopping clubs, Trendyol.com and Markafoni.com, followed, with three online mass merchants Hepsiburada.com, Limango.com.tr and Morhipo.com ranking behind them.

 

 

 

Why Turkey:

·        56.8 million credit cards and 100.2 million bank cards are being used in Turkey, which carries Turkey to 2nd tier in Europe in the number of credit cards and to 1st tier in bank cards.[39]

·        Online payments by credit cards exceeded TRY 34.6 billion in 2013. [40]

·        6% of online shoppers used their mobile devices for online shopping in 2014, which takes Turkey to 3rd place in use of mobile devices. [41]

·        Turkish e-commerce market grew by 35.5% since 2008 and the market volume reached approximately TRY 14 billion in 2013. If rise is preserved, the market is expected to grow by 15.8% at the end of 2017.[42]

 

Ecommerce models in Turkey:

·        The most commonly used models in the e-commerce market are "B2C" and "C2C" (i.e. Consumer to Consumer).

·        70% of the total domestic internet economy is based on consumption.[43]

·        Markafoni, Morhipo and Trendyol have particularly contributed to the increase of female online shoppers.

·        In 2012, the total disbursements in B2C model e-commerce operations reached TRY 15.3 billion, corresponding to 51% of the total online disbursements.

·        Travelling and plane ticket purchases constitute 25% of total online shopping disbursements. This is followed by insurance, consumer products, telecommunication and direct marketing.[44]

·        Lack of

o   trust in e-commerce;

o   labor force;

o   financial resources;

o   technical infrastructure;

o   know-how

o   and high application expenses

prevent B2B e-commerce from becoming widespread among small and medium sized enterprises.[45]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table below shows single card usage in online payment by industries in Turkey.[46]

Pie below shows shares single card online payments by Industries in Turkey, 2013.[47]

Chart below shows Share of Endorsements in online payments by Sectors, Turkey 2013.[48]

Chart below shows Occurrence Frequency of Card payments online, Turkey 2013. [49]

Chart below shows users’ choice of installments in credit card transactions, Turkey 2013.[50]

Table below shows Online Shopping rate of Genders based on their Age ranges, Turkey 2013.[51]

Pie shows Distribution of Online Transactions by Days of the Week, Turkey 2013: [52]

Infographics below show some facts about Turkish shopper:[53]

Infographics below show Most Sought & Sold Categories in Turkey:[54]

Infographic below shows e-comm Market size of Turkey, excluding VAT.[55]

 

Categories of E-commerce Market:[56]

Infographics of e-comm market size, Turkey 2014:[57]

Table below shows top ecommerce sites and their user interaction in Turkey.[58]

 

Thanks for your time.

 

g*** (at) y*** (dot) com



[4] Global and Turkish E-Commerce Market, Türkiye İş Bankası, April 2013.

 

[14] Euromonitor, http://www.internetworldstats.com/ , International telecommunication union http://www.itu.int/en/Pages/default.aspx , Planet Retail, World Bank, World Economic Forum, http://bkm.com.tr/ , http://www.slideshare.net/kleinerperkins/kpcb-internet-trends-2012

 

[16] ECB and BKM Online Strategy & Economic Analysis Unit – (Turkey), Finarket.ru – (Russia), IFC Mobile Money Scobing – Country Report 2011: Brazil, Reserve Bank of India, http://www.gaoresearch.com/POS/pos.php , http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1187.pdf

 

[17] Evolution of M-Commerce – Fatih Isbecer,  http://www.slideshare.net/themobilike/mobilike-madreport-q3

[18] US Census Bureau, Tencent, Facebook, wearesocial.sg

[19] US Census Bureau, GlobalWebIndex Wave 11, wearesocial.sg

[22] Deloitte Turkey retail sector update 2012, Euromonitor: Turkey’s ecommerce sector boosted by economic growth and young populace 2012, Mashable ecommerce 327 bln 2016 study 2012, ons.gov.uk, Yandex Business Development slide about ecommerce in Jan 2013, thomaswhite.com BRIC spotlight Brazil retail, shop.org Brazil and China emerging online retail powerhouses 2012, business-standard.com Indian retail sector outlook in 2012

[23] Deloitte Turkey retail sector update 2012, Euromonitor: Turkey’s ecommerce sector boosted by economic growth and young populace 2012, Mashable ecommerce 327 bln 2016 study 2012, ons.gov.uk, Yandex Business Development slide about ecommerce in Jan 2013, thomaswhite.com BRIC spotlight Brazil retail, shop.org Brazil and China emerging online retail powerhouses 2012, business-standard.com Indian retail sector outlook in 2012

[39] Digital Bosphorus: The State of Turkish E-Commerce, Sina Afra, 2013.

 

[41] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center

 

[42] Focus of Digital Market: E-Commerce (Dijital Pazarın Odak Noktası: E-Ticaret). Turkish Industry and Business Association (TÜSİAD). Sina Afra, TÜSİAD, June 2014.

 

[43] Türkiye İş Bankası, April 2013.

[46] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center. Webrazzi ecommerce 2014 conference presentation.

[47] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center. Webrazzi ecommerce 2014 conference presentation.

[48] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center. Webrazzi ecommerce 2014 conference presentation.

[49] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center. Webrazzi ecommerce 2014 conference presentation.

[50] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center. Webrazzi ecommerce 2014 conference presentation.

[51] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center. Webrazzi ecommerce 2014 conference presentation.

[52] Soner Canko, general director of BKM, Turkish Interbank Card Center. Webrazzi ecommerce 2014 conference presentation.

[53] 2012, İpsos – KMG Guide to understanding Turkey.

[54] ETID, Association of Ecommerce Retailers of Turkey. Presented at E-World conference in Barcelona, 2012.

[55] TUBİSAD, Association of Informatics Operators of Turkey, 2013 report in partnering with Deloitte, comScore & ETID.

[56] TUBİSAD, Association of Informatics Operators of Turkey, 2013 report in partnering with Deloitte, comScore & ETID.

[57] TUBİSAD, Association of Informatics Operators of Turkey, 2013 report in partnering with Deloitte, comScore & ETID.

[58] IAB Internet computational research Gemius, Jul 2013, connectedvivaki.com


















































Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Princeton goes open access to stop staff handing all copyright to journals - unless waiver granted.

This article below is directly taken from https://theconversation.com/princeton-goes-open-access-to-stop-staff-handing-all-copyright-to-journals-unless-waiver-granted-3596 which was published on Sep 28, 2011 by Sunanda Creagh.

Princeton goes open access to stop staff handing all copyright to journals - unless waiver granted

Princeton University hopes its new Open Access policy will pressure academic publishers to stop requiring the copyright to the papers they publish. Flickr/Yakinodi
Sunanda Creagh, The Conversation

Prestigious US academic institution Princeton University will prevent researchers from giving the copyright of scholarly articles to journal publishers, except in certain cases where a waiver may be granted.

The new rule is part of an Open Access policy aimed at broadening the reach of their scholarly work and encouraging publishers to adjust standard contracts that commonly require exclusive copyright as a condition of publication.

Universities pay millions of dollars a year for academic journal subscriptions. People without subscriptions, which can cost up to $25,000 a year for some journals or hundreds of dollars for a single issue, are often prevented from reading taxpayer funded research. Individual articles are also commonly locked behind pay walls.

Researchers and peer reviewers are not paid for their work but academic publishers have said such a business model is required to maintain quality.

At a September 19 meeting, Princeton’s Faculty Advisory Committee on Policy adopted a new open access policy that gives the university the “nonexclusive right to make available copies of scholarly articles written by its faculty, unless a professor specifically requests a waiver for particular articles.”

“The University authorizes professors to post copies of their articles on their own web sites or on University web sites, or in other not-for-a-fee venues,” the policy said.

“The main effect of this new policy is to prevent them from giving away all their rights when they publish in a journal.”

Under the policy, academic staff will grant to The Trustees of Princeton University “a nonexclusive, irrevocable, worldwide license to exercise any and all copyrights in his or her scholarly articles published in any medium, whether now known or later invented, provided the articles are not sold by the University for a profit, and to authorise others to do the same.”

In cases where the journal refuses to publish their article without the academic handing all copyright to the publisher, the academic can seek a waiver from the open access policy from the University.

The policy authors acknowledged that this may make the rule toothless in practice but said open access policies can be used “to lean on the journals to adjust their standard contracts so that waivers are not required, or with a limited waiver that simply delays open access for a few months.”

Academics will also be encouraged to place their work in open access data stores such as Arxiv or campus-run data repositories.

Princeton University spokesman, Martin A. Mbugua, said the policy was not an outright ban on staff handing copyright to journal publishers.

“It is a new open access policy that gives our faculty an advantage, and the option of seeking a waiver,” he said.

A step forward

Having prestigious universities such as Princeton and Harvard fly the open access flag represented a step forward, said open access advocate Professor Simon Marginson from the University of Melbourne’s Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

“The achievement of free knowledge flows, and installation of open access publishing on the web as the primary form of publishing rather than oligopolistic journal publishing subject to price barriers, now depends on whether this movement spreads further among the peak research and scholarly institutions,” he said.

“Essentially, this approach – if it becomes general - normalises an open access regime and offers authors the option of opting out of that regime. This is a large improvement on the present position whereby copyright restrictions and price barriers are normal and authors have to attempt to opt in to open access publishing, or risk prosecution by posting their work in breach of copyright.”

“The only interests that lose out under the Princeton proposal are the big journal publishers. Everyone else gains.”

Professor Tom Cochrane, Deputy Vice-Chancellor Technology, Information and Learning Support at the Queensland University of Technology, who has also led an Open Access policy mandate at QUT welcomed Princeton’s new rule but warned that the waiver must not be used too regularly, lest the policy be undermined.

If all universities and research institutions globally had policies similar to Princeton’s, the ultimate owner of published academic work would be universities and their research communities collectively, Professor Cochrane said.

“They are the source of all the content that publishers absolutely require to run their business model,” he said.

Dr Danny Kingsley, an open access expert and Manager of Scholarly Communication and ePublishing at Australian National University said the move was a positive step and that the push for open access should come from the academic community.

In practice, however, the new policy requires staff have a good understanding of the copyright arrangements they currently have with journal publishers in their field.

They will need to ensure future publisher’s agreements accommodate the new position and if not, obtain a waiver from the University.

“This sounds easy but in reality might be a challenge for some academics. There is considerable evidence to show that academics often have very little understanding of the copyright situation of their published work,” she said.

“What will be most telling will be the publishers’ response over the next year or so. If they start providing amended agreements to Princeton academics then the door will be open for other universities to follow this lead. I suspect however they will not, as generally the trend seems for publishers to make the open access path a complex and difficult one.”The Conversation

Sunanda Creagh, Editor, The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Friday, May 1, 2020

Mathematics (and Geometry and hopefully other Math subfield) formulas I have collected.

Here are some Mathematics formulas that I have collected. I will try to update them when I gather more.
If you know some formulas that aren't in this list, then comment below so I can add them here.
Thanks beforehand for your contribution.

Maths formulas 1st posted on May 1st, 2020. Happy Labour Day!










Source: Tobi Hüseyin, Tanfer Bekir et al., LYS Matematik Konu Anlatımlı, pi analitik yayınları, Ankara, August 2009.


And here is some geometry formulas. I will share them below when I collect some more. Pls, share the links of the formulas you deem important. 
Image 1 geometry median formula, 
Resim 1 geometri kenarortay formulu
https://vgy.me/u/5Tkz0T
the pic above uploaded on 25 June 2020

Here are some more formulas on geometry. 
Asagida bazi geometri formulleri var. Daha fazla formul eklemek icin lutfen link veya dosya paylasin buraya ekleyeyim. Tesekkurler. 
By the way, I want to thank for everyone who has any kind of effort in these. 
Image 2 - general review on triangles
Resim 2 - ucgenler hakkinda genel hatirlatmalar. Ucgen formulleri
Image 3 & 4 are about triangle bisector and interior circle formulas
Resim 3&4 yukarida ucgen ic aciortay, ic teget cember, G agirlik merkezi, cevrel cember gibi ozelliklerin formulleri

The images below are uploaded on 25 June 2020. 
Geometri formulleri


Tuesday, August 13, 2019

Trying to install Arch Linux in Virtual Machine on Windows 10

First trial, 12th August 2019. Kurban Bayram here in Turkey.

When I first started installing Arch Linux through virtual machine, the first parts were going smooth. However, I couldn't complete it, so I have deleted that VM, started another one. I wrote # cfdisk code and selected dos from the drop-down menu. After that, I did /dev/sda1 as a bootable primary partition, /dev/sda2 as a swap and /dev/sda3 as an extended partitions. Then I entered # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1 , it was good; but, # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda3 gave a problem. It showed
/dev/sda3 contains 'DOS/MBR boot sector' data
Proceed anyway? (y, N) y
mkfs.ext4: inode_size (128) * inodes_count (0) too big for a
                  filesystem with 0 blocks, specify higher inode_ratio (-i)
                  or lower inode count (-N).

After that, I learned the problem by writing # lsblk , it showed 1 KB for /dev/sda3 . I added Linux partition under /dev/sda3 , and that was /dev/sda5 . After that, I could easily enter # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda5 thing and which worked well, at least for now.

Secong trial, 13th August 2019. Tomorrow is Super Cup 2019, it will be played between Chelsea and Liverpool in Beşiktaş BJK Vodafone Park stadium in Istanbul, Turkey :)
My wish is "You will never walk alone" :) but as Jose Mourinho I have to support Chelsea, as well. So, I support both of them.

Let's get to the business, I have installed Arch Linux on my Virtual Machine. Now, I'm wondering if I can share files between the host Windows 10 OS and guest Arch Linux on Virtual Machine. After looking many things I think I will use Samba file sharing software to share files between the host and guest.
For now, as a post-installation process, I'm trying to install some programs on the Arch Linux in VM, but it seems that I don't have root privileges as a user. So I looked that up, first I wrote # su command and then I entered root password to become a root, after I wrote # usermod -aG wheel,anothergrouphere,yetanother,youcanseparatethemwithcomma,butnotspace usernamehere and then I was added to the wheel group, which I think grants the root privileges to my user. To check that you can write # groups usernamehere and it will show which groups are that user in. Enter # visudo and then uncomment %wheel ALL = (ALL) ALL to give root privileges to the wheel group. Reboot. Then I did as my user # sudo pacman -S emacs to download and install emacs.

Monday, August 6, 2018

Reposted from NYTimes: "Worshiping the False Idols of Wellness."

This blog post is almost exact copy of The New York Times post "Worshiping the False Idols of Wellness." Its link is here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/01/style/wellness-industrial-complex.html

Charcoal, "toxins" and other forms of nonsense are the backbone of the wellness-industrial complex.
by Jen Gunter. Aug 1, 2018.

Before we go further, I'd like to clear something up: Wellness is not the same as medicine. Medicine is the science of reducing death and disease, and increasing long and healthy lives. Wellness used to mean a blend of health and happiness. Something that made you feel good or brought joy and was not medically harmful - perhaps a massage or a walk along the beach. But it has become a false antidote to the fear of modern life and death. The wellness industry takes medical terminology, such as "inflammation" or "free radicals," and levigates it to the point of incomprehension. The resulting product is a D.I.Y. medicine for longevity that comes with a confidence that science can only aspire to achieve. Let's take the trend of adding a pinch of activated charcoal to your food or drink. While the black color is strikingly unexpected and alluring, it's sold as a supposed "detox." Guess what? It has the same efficacy as a spell from the local witch. Maybe it's a matter of aesthetics. Wellness potions in beautiful jars with untested ingredients of unknown purity are practically packaged for Instagram. I also want to clear up what toxins actually are: harmful substances produced by some plants, animals and bacteria (and, for them, charcoal is no cure). "Toxins," as defined by the peddlers of these dubious cures, are the harmful effluvia of modern life that supposedly roam our bodies, causing belly bloat and brain fog, like a microscopic Emmanuel Goldstein from George Orwell's "1984." For without these toxins there can be no search for purity - "clean" tampons, "clean" food, "clean" makeup. There are also sacred acts and rituals to follow, and if you have unlocked the right achievement level you will release your inner goddess.
Medicine and religion have long been deeply intertwined, and it's only relatively recently that they have separated. The wellness-industrial complex seeks to resurrect that connection. It's like a medical throwback, as if the halcyon days of health were 5,000 years ago. Ancient cleansing rituals with a modern twist - supplements, useless products and scientifically unsupported tests. The dietary supplements that are the backbone of wellness make up a $30 billion a year business despite studies showing they have no value for longevity (only a few vitamins have proven medical benefits, like folic acid before and during pregnancy and vitamin D for older people at risk of falling). Modern medicine wants you to get your micronutrients from your diet, which is inarguably the most natural source. Yet the wellness-industrial complex has managed to pervert that narrative and make supplements a necessary tool for nonsensical practices, such as boosting the immune system or fighting the war on inflammation. The resulting fluorescent yellow urine from multivitamins may provide a false sense of efficacy, but it's a fool's gold (and the consequence of excessive B2 that couldn't possibly be absorbed). So what's the harm of spending money on charcoal for nonexistent toxins or vitamins for expensive urine or grounding bedsheets to better connect you with the earth's electrons? Here's what: the placebo effect or "trying something natural" can lead people with serious illnesses to postpone effective medical care. Every doctor I know has more than one story about a patient who died because they chose to try to alkalinize their blood or gambled on intravenous vitamins instead of getting cancer care. Data is emerging that cancer patients who opt for alternative medical practices, many promoted by companies that sell products of questionable value, are more likely to die. Moving the kind of product that churns the wheels of the wellness-industrial complex requires a constant stream of fear and misinformation. Look closer at most wellness sites and at many of their physician partners, and you'll find a plethora of medical conspiracy theories: Vaccines and autism. The dangers of water fluoridation. Bras and breast cancer. Cellphones and brain cancer. Heavy metal poisoning. AIDS as a construct of Big Pharma.
Most people think they will be immune to these fringe ideas, but science says otherwise. We all mistake repetition for accuracy, a phenomenon called the illusory truth effect, and knowledge about subject matter doesn't necessarily protect you. Even a single exposure to information that sounds like it could be quasi-plausible can increase the perception of accuracy. Belief in medical conspiracy theories, such as the idea that the pharmaceutical industry is suppressing "natural" cures, increases the likelihood that a person will take dietary supplements. So to keep selling supplements and earthing mats and coffee enema kits and the other revenue generating merchandise, you can't just spark fear. You must constantly stoke its flames. There can be no modern wellness industry without medical conspiracy theories. Even if you completely eschew these sites for the chicanery they are, people who come to believe this misinformation can affect health by both their failure to vaccinate and by voting against evidence-based health policies. Also, as a doctor I take it to heart when I hear about the latest measles outbreak or when a friend spends money on a therapy that can't possibly help. When patients ask for an unsupported test - such as urine or salivary hormone levels, often promoted on wellness sites - I have to explain that I can't in good faith order a useless test. I also don't want people to die. So why do people turn to wellness? There are symptoms that I believe have been with us since the beginning of time, so common that they are likely part of the human experience: fatigue, bloat, low libido, episodic pain, loss of vigor. When medicine can only offer a therapy, not a cure, or when doctors give undesired answers - suggesting attention to sleep hygiene, for instance - it isn't hard to see how the intoxicating confidence and theater of wellness could beckon. Medical illness is also scary. Who wouldn't want to take IV vitamins instead of chemotherapy? I admit that doctors can learn something from wellness. It's clear that some people looking for healers, so we must find ways to serve that need that are medically ethical. We doctors can do more to provide factual information about hazardous substances, such as carcinogens and endocrine disrupting chemicals, in products and the environment from medically vetted sites with no products to sell, such as National Cancer Institute and the National Endocrine Society. Many people - women especially - have long been marginalized and dismissed by medicine, but the answer does not lie in predatory conspiracy theories, a faux religion or expensive magic. In its current form, wellness isn't filling in the gaps left by medicine. It's exploiting them.

Dr. Jen Gunter is an obstetrician and gynecologist practicing in California.

I have copied this text from NYTimes, because recently I met some people from Herbalife who claim that they provide wellness for their clients. I come across this text and it enlightened me. I share it hoping that it will enlighten many more from getting trapped in wellness mania. Thanks.